Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Charlie X

January 21, 2018 Leave a comment

I think I’ll do this in two parts–steam of consciousness as the show is going, and then a summary, if I feel inspired.  You shouldn’t look for great literature in either part, however.  Also, as this episode is over fifty years old, and you had to look pretty hard to find this, there will not be any spoiler warnings on material more than twenty years old.

I loved the scene where Spock is playing the Vulcan lyre and Uhura is singing the supposedly off-off-the-top-of-her-head song.  I don’t remember that level of fun in TOS.

It seems to take them a long time to realize they have an omnipotent toddler among them.  Am I the only one who considers that when meting pretty much every new person?

Spends a lot of time looking at Yeoman Rand with soft filters.

The young yeoman was. . . was wearing pants!  A woman with covered legs!  I was unaware.

They stand really close to each other in some of these scenes.

There’s a scene in the gym that starts off with three women in neck-to-toe red leotards and leggings doing rolls, and I can only imagine that this was pornography for the 1960s.

. . . and there’s the first murder on screen.

It’s so funny that at this point, seventeen was considered adolescent.  Most of the time, I hear that term used for thirteen to fifteen years olds, now. . . .

(NETFLIX IS DOWN?  When does Netflix go down?)

Yeoman Rand in space lingerie!

I just caught Leonard Nimoy putting his elbow through a set wall.  It’s only there for a fraction of a second, but Yeoman Rand’s room will need patching.

Every time they mention Thasians, I think they’re talking about Asians.

Charlie’s understanding of human emotions varies quite wildly throughout this episode.

Summary: Assume that everyone is an omnipotent toddler; also, bend over and Kidd your ass goodbye.


Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

“We Clever Jacks”, by Greg van Eekhout

October 4, 2016 Leave a comment

“We Clever Jacks” is a story about a Halloween rebellion, of a kind, from one class of unspoken victim of the holiday.

Non-Spoiler Summary

We pick them, we bring them home, we hollow them out, we give them faces… but nothing more.  They want more.  So much more.

Why should you read it?

“We Clever Jacks” is a sad and funny piece, about a page long, about the fate of jack-o’-lanterns, who don’t want to just be sitting on porches.  They want to rise up.

This is another story that’s so short, you may as well read it instead of reading me convincing you to read it.

Where to find “We Clever Jacks”

This story is available freely on van Eekhout’s website, Writing and Snacks. It is also available in audio form from Podcastle.

(I have been meaning to post this in October for at least two years, now.)

Categories: Uncategorized

Not going to do it.

August 27, 2013 2 comments

Heh. I proved to myself that I could get my goal met in the rest of the year with a near month-long sprint a couple of months ago. . . and then found out that I didn’t want to. Honestly, folks, while I’m still looking to the Hugo list for reading suggestions, I’ve been focussing on technical reading and reading longer fiction right now. And reading for comfort.

I don’t think anyone is disappointed but me, but I’m releasing myself from a goal. Stuff will appear here when I have something so good you need to know about it. . . not because I have a goal to hit, that I’m not enjoying.

Sorry, and glad.

Categories: Uncategorized

The Hugos 2012: Fun, quality, or both?

I have voted.  I’ll discuss my votes in another post shortly, but I just wanted to bring up an issue that I faced this time–the issue of fun.

China Mieville is a very good writer.  One of the first Hugos I voted on, I voted for The City and The City to win the Best Novel award.  He was nominated again this year, for Embassytown.  I understand _Embassytown_ is a very good book.  I didn’t read it, even though I voted.  I didn’t run out of time; the voting is actually still open.  I _chose_ not to read it.  Why?  Because I might have had to vote for it, and I didn’t want to.

I started to read the Kindle sample of the book on, um, on my Kindle.  I was completely puzzled by what was going on.  Before I could start the book, I had to go to Wikipedia and read a summary of the very odd social structures that are present in the story.  That doesn’t impress me.  It may very well have been my own distraction, as htis particular Hugo season was full of personal upheaval for me, but I _didn’t_ have this problem with several of the other books, including _Leviathan Wakes_, which I enjoyed a lot, and decided I wanted to vote for as one of my top two books.

So, to summarize, I opted not to read _Embassytown_ because it was inaccessible, and “hard to read”, and I didn’t want the books I voted for this time to be something that someone down the line, looking at this vote in history, would find hard.  _Leviathan Wakes_ was a hell of a tale, and took no effort to get into.  _Deadline_?  The only effort this book took was the effort of reading (or in my case re-reading _Feed_ before it, and _Blackout_ after it.

So I guess what i”m saying is that I’m making a value judgment here.  I don’t want to Hugo to be about the _best_ book I read this year.  I want it to be about my _favorite_ book that I read this year, and I don’t happen to like books that require me to _work_, right now.  Sounds harsh, but I read for fun, and I want to be drawn in, I want to be enterfained, I want a book to be an easy ride.

I’m sure _Embassytown_ is a great book, and I look forward to reading it.  I surely have enjoyed everything of Mieville’s that I’ve read so far immensely.  I just was afraid that if I put the effort in now, I’d have to vote for it, which I was unwilling to do.  So, read later.

Categories: Uncategorized