Archive for June, 2012

“The Man Who Ended History”, by Ken Liu

“The Man Who Ended History” is a 2011 science-fiction novella by Ken Liu.  It is a very emotionally difficult story.  It has been nominated for the Hugo for Best Novella of 2012.

Non-Spoiler Summary

I had heard the name Ken Liu before this year.  This year, he’s made me cry twice.  “The Paper Menagerie” was a wonder of emotion and small tempest.  This story. . .  is harder.  Much harder.  The crying here is because hundreds or thousands of real people are tortured and maimed in the events of this story.  It covers parts of the history of Unit 731, the Japanese parallel to Auschwitz, with parallels to the human experimentation that Mengele performed.  So.  Not an uncomplicated tear-jerker, like “The Paper Menagerie”, but a solid science fiction story that happens to have, at its core, incredible inhumanity.  Be prepared. Be warned.

A scientist develops a way to view the past, and attempts to use it to help people cope with the damage the events of Unit 731 did to their families.  The governments involved try to stop him from using it at all.  As a given point in the past can only be viewed once, the concerns of archaeology–where investigation is often destructive–are mixed with the attempts of governments to control and spin the observation of their past sins.

Why should you read it?

This is a sad story.  I said that about “The Paper Menagerie”, and I will say it again.  The science in this story is fascinating, and the political pressures are all too real and believable. . . and as much as I wished the events that were being viewed were sunshine and dandelions, the fact that they were war crimes and terrors makes it real.  Makes it count.  However, it also makes reading the story a bit like trying to appreciate stained glass by eating it.

The documentary style of the writing is genius, and brilliantly done.  The ideas are vast.  The story is no fun at all, so don’t go in expecting any.

Where to find “The Man Who Ended History”

Ken Liu has generously allowed us to read it online.

“Six Months, Three Days”, by Charlie Jane Anders

“Six Months, Three Days” is a 2011 science fiction short story by Charlie Jane Anders.  It has been nominated for the Hugo for Best Novelette of 2012.

Non-Spoiler Summary

The man who can see the only possible future has a relationship with the woman who can see all the myriad possible futures.

Why should you read it?

Oh, man, just the high concept should be enough to make you run for this one. . . but the writing is also extraordinary.  The characters are both bent, shaped by their powers, entirely human both despite their specialness and because of it.  They have all the problems you expect that each of them would have, and that they would have as a couple.  The writing takes into account that sometimes they both already remember having a discussion, and they’re tired of it before it even happens.  I cried when Doug was enjoying his first intimacy with Judy. . . and at the same time mourning that now, one of the limited number of really special moments in  his life was past, instead of still to come.

Strongly recommended.  I don’t see anything in the field that would keep me from this being at least my second choice for the Hugo, and I’d be happy for it to be my first choice.  I think it deserves the award.

Where to find “Six Months, Three Days” has generously allowed us to read it online.